|
Peace is a product of understanding
The communications gap between the United States
administration and much of the world is widening. This fact has
not gone unnoticed by a number of concerned individuals in government
and business in Washington DC, where I was fortunate to attend a
conference entitled Further prospects for a strategic partnership,
examining the historic and contemporary relationship between Egypt
and the United States.
Around 400 people attended the gathering, hosted
by Foreign Policy Magazine, an influential publication funded by
the Carnegie Endowment for Peace. The encouraging turnout indicated
sharp interest in the question at hand, formulated by Foreign Policy
as follows: Can affinities between Egypt and the United States
that helped secure strategic partnerships for a quarter century
now be drawn upon to support joint action on new and enlarged strategic
goals appropriate to the 21st century?
Needless to say, it all depends on what those enlarged
strategic goals are going to be.
For the purposes of the conference, speakers addressed three aspects
political, economic and cultural of a strategy
to advance the causes of peace, prosperity and understanding between
America and the Middle East. At a time when America pursues
a military solution to perceived threats from Iraq, the words seemed
somewhat strained.
Nevertheless, the sentiment was positive when former
secretary of state Lawrence Eagleburger opened the proceedings,
introducing Republican senator John Sununu, who spoke optimistically
about getting beyond the era of crises.
In this political section of the program, Egyptian
presidential adviser Osama El Baz, US special envoy Anthony Zinni
and Abdel Moneim Said of the Al-Ahram Center for Strategic Studies
contributed divergent but essentially compatible views. El Baz was,
as always, uncompromising on the issue of regional peace.
The next segment looked at prospects for trade, investment
and economic development. Dr. Youssef Boutros-Ghali discussed the
floating of the pound and the expected effect of stimulating investment.
Dr. Fred Bergston, director of the Institute for International Economics,
and Catherine Novelli, assistant US trade representative for Europe
and the Mediterranean, placed Egypt in the context of global trade,
outlining opportunities that would arise in an enabling business
environment.
I myself was honored to speak as a member of the
Egyptian business community. In this capacity, I emphasized that
whatever the obstacles and they are many the framework
for achieving prosperity in Egypt is closer than ever before.
Gamal Mubarak, the keynote speaker, focused on reform
in the National Democratic Party. Finally, for the cultural portion
of the program, we heard from Dr. Ismail Serageldin of the Bibliotheca
Alexandrina; Edward Walker, president of the Middle East Institute;
Mona Zulficar, corporate lawyer and civil society activist; and
Mary Eisenhower, CEO of People to People International.
The Washington gathering provided a valuable forum
for exchange. The general feeling was that the Egypt-US alliance
remains strong and is vital to the resolution of regional conflict.
Yet at the heart of this meeting was the global tension arising
from the current US administrations vision of foreign policy.
Clearly, if peace, prosperity and understanding are
what were after, then these values must pass from rhetoric
into action, and those in power must set examples of how to achieve
them.
The United States has always been a model for the
balance between private and public interests, for openness and debate.
It was heartening to see many thoughtful Americans agreeing that
to ignore their nations historic status and alliances was
in no ones interest.
Indeed, peace is a product of understanding. There
can be no lasting prosperity, in our region or the world, without
it.
Mohamed Mansour
President, AmCham
Submit
your comment
Top
|