|
INFLATION INDICES DIVERGE
According to traditional indicators, the national inflation rate
jumped from 3.7 percent in 2002 to 10.1 percent in 2003. Most casual
observers, meanwhile, are expecting the numbers for 2004 to be no
less shocking, as general commodity prices, in the wake of 2003s
currency devaluation, have continued to rise.
Some observers are suggesting, however, that the two indices historically
employed to track the inflation rate the consumer price index
(CPI) and the wholesale price index (WPI) are less than entirely
accurate. In the last few years, the government has made an
effort through its monetary policy to concentrate on inflation targeting,
but it needs a more accurate measure of inflation in order to do
so, said Hany Farahat, an economic analyst at the Ministry
of Investment.
Inflation is usually measured by tracking the price changes of
a basket of essential commodities, all of which are assigned different
weights. Fluctuations in these prices are then averaged to determine
an overall rate of inflation. The endeavor is more art than science,
though, as the rate will depend to a large degree on the weights
given to particular index constituents.
In Egypt, the CPI and the WPI are the two longest-established
gauges of inflation. Both utilize the same formula the Laspeyres
index and have historically reflected similar movement, rising
and falling in tandem. Since the 1960s, the behavior of the
two indicators has nearly always reflected the same trends,
explained one local economist.
Yet despite their similarities, say observers, the two indicators
have diverged dramatically in recent years. In 2003, after currency
devaluation forced the issue, consumer prices increased an average
of 4.2 percent. Wholesale prices, however, shot up by an average
of 14.3 percent.
Most observers attribute the divergence to the simple fact that
the CPI and WPI cover different baskets of goods. The CPI, for example,
is based on the retail prices paid by consumers, as obtained by
a household survey administered by the Central Agency for Public
Mobilization & Statistics (CAPMAS). Therefore, the CPI has a
large non-variable component, with over 50 percent of its basket
consisting of subsidized goods. The WPI, by contrast, tracks wholesale
prices, and is comprised mainly of non-subsidized manufacturing
and agricultural goods.
The CPI hasnt truly reflected inflation rates, because
it hasnt sufficiently covered all products. Instead, its
concentrated on a less diversified bundle weights assigned
to products have concentrated on subsidized goods, or those subject
to price controls, said Farahat. In comparison, the
WPI is biased against imported products, which are much more volatile
and subject to changes in international prices or exchange rate
devaluation.
A recent study by the Egyptian Center for Economic Studies (ECES)
reached similar conclusions. The report, Why did consumer
and wholesale prices diverge in Egypt recently?, explained
that the two indices different concentrations have led to
contrasting reactions following fluctuations in the exchange rate
or subsidy schemes. For example, the large number of tradable goods
included in the WPIs basket made that index more susceptible
to the recent fall of the exchange rate than the CPI, which includes
a large number of subsidized constituents, the prices of which were
not subject to change.
CAPMAS recently revised the CPI, upgrading the indexs base
year from FY 1995-96 to FY 1999-00, in keeping with its system of
re-basing every five years. While the update will undoubtedly improve
the accuracy of the index, ongoing inclusion of subsidized goods
will likely keep inflation understated. The former CPI definitely
underestimated the inflation rate in Egypt, but it may be too early
to judge the current [updated] index, said Farahat. We
will have to wait to see the trend that emerges from the annual
change in the index to make a fair assessment.
For the last several years, countries around the globe have been
trying to find new ways to gauge inflation. In India, for example,
economists are trying to get a more precise fix on inflation by
launching a producer price index, or PPI, alongside,
or in place of, the WPI. The index measures the costs of a basket
of inputs purchased by a typical firm. In countries
such as Brazil and Poland, meanwhile, additional variables
including commodity prices, financial markets and real
economic activity are being integrated into novel systems
for targeting inflation.
In Egypt, the CPI and WPI seem likely to remain the primary indices
for tracking price increases, at least for the time being. CAPMAS
officials, however, have reportedly been discussing ways of improving
the methodologies of both indices.
Rona Shedid, financial analyst at local brokerage HC Investment
& Securities, suggested that, in the meantime, the weights of
subsidized goods within the indices particularly within the
CPI should be adjusted downward. Because theyre
important commodities, you cant eliminate them altogether,
she said. But their weights should be reduced.
|
THE INDICES:HOW THEY WORK
Despite the two indices mounting divergence, the two
inflation-targeting methodologies are more alike than not,
at least in determining how relevant data is collected, even
if the commodities they track differ.
The CPI, for its part, measures prices paid by consumers
on the ground, tracking a fixed basket of goods and services
commonly purchased by private households. These approximately
650 items are further broken down into eight main groups according
to their level of importance based on CAPMAS household surveys.
Prices are collected from a sample of some 1,230 retail outlets
countrywide.
The WPI, meanwhile, tracks wholesale prices, which, according
to CAPMAS, means the price of a commodity before any changes
are made by wholesale merchants to its shape or nature.
These are drawn from the agricultural and manufacturing sectors,
and are further classified into 16 sub-categories. Items are
selected according to their relative importance, based on
domestic production and import. Prices including taxes
are collected monthly from a sample of some 1,435 outlets
from across the country.
While the two indices track disparate groupings of goods,
however, collection techniques are largely the same. Prices
for both indices are collected by CAPMAS officials, who visit
the areas in question and compile data using price collection
forms, although some inquiries are made by telephone. To ensure
accuracy, official interviewers must verify all price changes
and provide explanations for abnormal fluctuations. These
prices are then scanned at the CAPMAS head office, where calculations
are reviewed by statisticians from the organizations
price division.
A major difference between the two indices, however, is
their respective reference periods. While both indices use
a ratio of arithmetic average prices with aggregation based
on a fixed base Laspeyres formula, the reference period used
for the CPI is FY 1999-00 equals 100, while that of the WPI
is FY 1986-87 equals 100. Given the 13-year gap, it is hardly
surprising that the two indices often move at different rates.
|
Lynne Elassy
Submit
your comment
Top
|